Transactions

Selected transactions and representative escrow experience.

Trust is stronger when the proof is easy to review. This page brings together publicly documented transactions and representative case studies that reflect the firm's work across capital raises, public-company financings, digital-asset treasury transactions, acquisition holdbacks, shareholder workflows, and distribution support.

What you will find here
  • Selected named transactions drawn from public-company and publicly announced deal activity
  • Representative case studies for confidential or non-public work
  • Examples aligned to the service categories clients ask about most often
Selected named transactions

Where public records and public-company disclosures are available, deal teams can review names, dates, and transaction context.

These examples are drawn from SEC or OTC transaction documents, public-company disclosures, and CEM's completed transaction history. Together they give deal teams a direct view into the kinds of assignments CEM has supported.

SEC filing | 2023

Esports Entertainment Group

CEM was named as Escrow Manager in a 2023 SEC-filed agreement connected to a redemption structure with a maximum escrow amount of $7.19M.

  • Role: Escrow Manager
  • Public source: SEC exhibit filing
  • Transaction context: public-company proceeds and redemption support
View public filing
SEC filing | 2025

AlphaTON Capital

CEM was named as Escrow Manager in 2025 financing documents tied to a private placement and acquisition-related transaction.

  • Role: Escrow Manager
  • Public source: SEC financing filing
  • Transaction context: private placement and acquisition support
View public filing
OTC filing | 2025

Kazia Therapeutics

CEM was named as Escrow Manager in 2025 transaction documents associated with Kazia Therapeutics' public-company financing.

  • Role: Escrow Manager
  • Public source: OTC Markets filing
  • Transaction context: public-company financing escrow
View public filing
SEC filing | 2024

NeOnc Technologies

CEM was named as Escrow Agent in a 2024 amended and restated escrow agreement related to investor subscription proceeds.

  • Role: Escrow Agent
  • Public source: SEC exhibit filing
  • Transaction context: subscription escrow administration
View public filing
SEC filings | 2025-2026

Tharimmune

CEM supported financing activity associated with Tharimmune's digital-asset treasury strategy, including a November 2025 transaction announced at approximately $545M and a January 2026 follow-on closing announced at $55M.

  • Transaction context: public-company private placement and treasury-strategy financing
  • Public source: SEC offering and closing disclosures
  • Scale disclosed: approximately $545M in November 2025 and $55M in January 2026
View public filing
SEC filings | 2025

Eightco

CEM supported financing activity associated with Eightco's Worldcoin treasury strategy, with public disclosures describing up to $270M gross proceeds and approximately $261M net proceeds at closing.

  • Transaction context: public-company financing tied to a digital-asset treasury strategy
  • Public source: SEC 8-K and closing release
  • Scale disclosed: up to $270M gross proceeds and approximately $261M net proceeds
View public filing
SEC filings | 2026

Shuttle Pharmaceuticals / United Dogecoin

CEM supported merger-related financing activity associated with Shuttle Pharmaceuticals' announced business combination with United Dogecoin and a concurrent $11M PIPE financing.

  • Transaction context: public-company business combination and concurrent PIPE financing
  • Public source: SEC announcement and closing filings
  • Scale disclosed: $11M PIPE financing announced with the merger transaction
View public filing
Representative case studies

Confidential work can still be described in a way that shows operating judgment.

Not every engagement can be named publicly. These representative case studies show the kinds of release terms, notice mechanics, payment controls, and coordination demands the firm is built to support.

Representative examples may be anonymized to respect client confidentiality.

Acquisition escrow

Acquisition Holdback Escrow

A buyer and seller needed neutral administration of a post-close holdback with negotiated notice rights and staged release conditions.

  • Custom release timing aligned to the purchase agreement
  • Documented notices and milestone tracking
  • Disbursement coordination when release conditions were met
Public financing

Public-Company Financing Escrow

A financing team needed a responsive escrow partner for a compressed timetable involving subscription proceeds, counsel, banking logistics, and closing notices.

  • Escrow setup aligned to deal documents and timing windows
  • Stakeholder communication across issuer, counsel, and banking parties
  • Clean release support at closing
Shareholder services

Shareholder Liquidity Event

A liquidity event required coordinated holder communication, accurate payment instructions, and disciplined exception handling across a changing shareholder base.

  • Workflow built around shareholder records and disbursement controls
  • Operational handling of documentation and payment exceptions
  • Clear status visibility for management and service partners
Distribution support

Special Dividend Distribution

A corporate distribution required documented controls around record dates, payment execution, and holder-facing follow-through.

  • Paying-agent style coordination across the distribution workflow
  • Organized processing and exception management
  • Support for accurate, orderly disbursement
Digital-asset transactions

Digital-Asset Treasury and Token Transactions

A public-company financing required escrow support around treasury-strategy positioning, documented release controls, and compressed coordination across counsel, banking parties, and transaction stakeholders.

  • Escrow workflow aligned to financing documents and timing windows
  • Structured coordination across treasury-strategy, financing, and closing parties
  • Documented release support in a market-sensitive transaction
How to read this page

The purpose is not volume for its own sake. It is credibility, fit, and context.

Counsel, CFOs, placement agents, and counterparties usually want to know whether the escrow partner has seen transactions like theirs before and whether the service model will stay responsive under timing pressure.

  • Selected named transactions show public deal context where documentation or company disclosures are available
  • Representative case studies show transaction patterns without compromising client confidentiality
  • Both are meant to help deal teams assess fit before the first call
Start with a live transaction

If your team is evaluating escrow support now, the next step should be direct.

Bring the structure, timing, and sensitivities of the transaction. CEM can help determine fit, workflow, and likely next steps quickly.